Arizona Accident Information Law Blog : Arizona Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney : Solomon & Relihan Law Firm : Auto Accidents & Car Wrecks : AZ Accident Information Law Blog

Authorities were still investigating the incident to determine what the cause was. Racine County District Attorney’s office has taken over the case to review it. There is no information on the specific injuries the victim suffered or whether or not he is in stable condition.

Like a motorcycle rider, there are many things that could occur involving a bicycle rider that ultimately cause serious injury to the rider. Both situations are similar in that drivers may not see the rider approaching right away and they may be unable to stop in time to prevent from hitting them. One of the reasons accidents like this occur is because the rider does not give the right of way to vehicles passing across their lane, such as through a four-way stop. Side-impact automobile accidents occur for the same reason. However, in many cases, the driver may not see the bike rider attempting to cross the lane and they could collide with them. If the impact is severe enough, the rider could be thrown from the bike and suffer very serious injuries.

This accident is worsened by the fact that the victim involved was an elderly man. In many instances when an elderly person is involved, the injuries they sustain could possibly be worsened because of their age. In many cases, their bodies are simply too weak either due to the injuries themselves or because of their age and they are not able to recover fully or at all. If the investigation that authorities conducted shows that the driver was at fault for the accident, that driver should be held responsible for their actions and the 88-year-old victim and his family should get compensation for the injuries that were caused.
 

The 47-year-old man was airlifted to a medical facility where he was treated and declared to be in stable condition. There is no word whether speed, alcohol or any substances were factors in this single-vehicle accident.

It is very easy to speculate what the cause of the accident was, but there is no way to know what caused it until an investigation reveals this information. There are several things that often cause single-vehicle accidents like this one. In some cases it could be inattentive drivers who either miss a turn or are unable to stop in time to prevent from hitting an obstacle or another driver in front of them. The fact that the pickup truck the victim was driving came apart from the frame could possibly indicate that he was driving at high speeds which ultimately led to a high velocity impact. However, it is also possible that a defect within the car caused the accident and the subsequent damage to the vehicle. Still, without a full investigation there are simply too many questions left unanswered regarding the causes of the accident.

Fortunately the victim in this accident is now in stable condition and he did not suffer any serious injuries that ended up costing him his life. Although it was a single-vehicle accident, the fact that the truck was torn apart could have caused extremely serious injuries that resulted in the victim’s death. If the accident was caused because of a defect in the vehicle, the victim could possibly get compensation for the damages that occurred to the vehicle and for the injuries that he sustained in the accident. Given the extent of the damage to the vehicle, the man is very lucky to have survived the accident, despite his injuries. The victim’s family could have been left mourning the loss of their loved one if the result of this accident had been worse.

Two other pit bull dogs reportedly involved in the incident were taken into custody of animal control. One of the dogs was tranquilized following the incident. Authorities are still investigating the incident to determine what factors played a part in it.

This incident demonstrates how easily a dog can get agitated in any situation. When a dog senses any kind of threat, even if it is not against them, they will be quick to attack the threatening person or animal. A dog can become agitated very quickly and this can easily cause a dog to attack and bite a person. A dog’s training could also play a part in any dog bite incident if they were trained to attack a person in an attempt to protect its owner. In some cases, this is why children are often the victims of very serious attacks. Children trying to play with a dog or pet a dog can agitate the dog and cause it to lunge at the child and cause serious injuries because of a bite.

In this incident it is possible that the dog’s owner could be held liable for the attack especially because it occurred on the owner’s property in her backyard. If the incident had occurred somewhere else away from the owner’s property, the victim may not be able to get compensation with the help of an experienced lawyer. If the dog does not have proper vaccination records or if its vaccinations are out of date, this could be another detail that could be a factor in the outcome of this incident. The possibility for rabies could make the situation much more dangerous for the victim, which would mean they would be entitled to higher compensation because of this attack.
 

The bus then swerved and rolled over, striking a metal support pole which tore the bus in half from front to back along the passenger window line. Some of the passengers were decapitated as a result of the wreck.

An investigation into the serious bus crash showed that the bus driver was driving recklessly; weaving in and out of traffic and driving at high speeds. Prosecutors said the driver had been operating during his off-hours and operating with very little sleep. The bus driver was charged with 15 counts of manslaughter and 15 counts of criminally negligent homicide as well as 23 counts of assault based on the number of injuries passengers suffered. If he is convicted of manslaughter he could receive a maximum of 15 years in jail.

Operating any kind of vehicle with a lack of sleep or under the influence of substances that could reduce reaction time or judgment is a dangerous act that, as this incident shows; could result in extremely serious consequences. The driver in this incident should have taken better precaution when driving the bus to avoid this type of situation. Driver fatigue is one of the biggest causes of traffic accidents throughout the United States. Just like driving under the influence, driver fatigue causes a slower response time and could impair the driver’s vision, such as causing blurry vision. The fact that the driver in this case had a previous criminal record for moving violations makes this incident much more serious. Although the driver will be brought to justice for his negligence, unfortunately nothing will help the families of those that perished in this accident.
 

When attempting to overtake another vehicle ahead of you, you should always make sure there is a lane on the left side to be able to overtake the slow moving vehicle in front of you. In addition, you should always make sure that there is enough space behind you when you attempt to move back into the original lane of traffic. Unfortunately, some vehicles attempt to overtake another unaware that the other vehicle is too close behind them to overtake it. As a result, the front of the vehicle they are trying to pass hits the rear of the passing vehicle and serious collisions could occur. The severity of the accident could vary depending on several factors including the speed of both vehicles and the impact at which they hit.

In the case of two buses trying to overtake one another, the weight of the buses as well as the addition of several passengers create more factors for bus drivers to take into consideration when driving on congested roadways or driving at higher rates of speed. The size and weight of the buses in this incident could have also played a part in the resulting impact and the fire that killed all the passengers in the buses. The position of the semi truck involved in this accident should also be taken into account because that could have been a factor that prevented the two buses from overtaking one another in this incident. It is very tragic when one person loses their lives in an automobile accident. It is much worse when several people lose their lives as in this incident.
 

A witness told police she saw another driver drive away with the 22-year-old. As the witness followed the two, she saw the second driver enter the passenger’s side of the Ford Taurus and the two drove away. The second person involved in the incident was also arrested.

Reckless driving and aggressive driving are both extremely dangerous acts that can get a person sent to jail or cause a very serious auto accident. This incident demonstrates one of many reasons why reckless driving is very dangerous. In this incident the other drivers on the road were forced to stop, and wound up getting into an accident because many of them were unable to do so. However, reckless driving does not necessarily have to be the result of actions such as driving on the opposite side of the road. Reckless driving could also include weaving in and out of traffic to pass other vehicles or attempting to cross the train tracks as a train approaches. All of these actions could result in very serious injuries or fatalities because other drivers may not be able to prevent an accident from occurring.

You and your loved ones should never have to be in a position where your lives are threatened because of the reckless actions of another driver on the road. If you or someone you know suffers injuries or a fatality as a result of somebody else’s reckless driving, you should get compensation for your injuries or loss. Nobody should be in this sort of position and the parties at fault should be brought to justice if they cause a serious accident with injuries.
 

The dog then lunged at the woman and bit her in the face. The owner was unable to provide current vaccination records for the dog when police were investigating, thus the dog and her puppies were placed in the custody of the city pound for observation. The Clay County Attorney’s Office will review initial police reports to determine if charges will be filed. If charges will be filed against the woman they could include charges for filing a false police report.

Filing a false police report is a somewhat common offense and is often regarded as a misdemeanor depending on the severity of the offense and the ensuing results. People who file false police reports could face charges that result in a fine of roughly $1,000 or possible jail time if the offense is severe enough. In this incident, the woman’s false police report could have resulted in legal troubles for the dog’s owner and it could have also resulted in the dog being destroyed if police found that its vaccination records were not up to date.

When a person is under distress, it is possible for them to forget certain details of a traumatic event and accidentally provide information that may turn out to be untrue. However, when a person blatantly provides information to a police officer and knowingly lies to the police, they should be held accountable for their actions and false statements if they result in serious legal troubles for those they accuse. Nobody deserves to be falsely accused and nobody should provide false information in an attempt to hide the actual truth from the police to avoid getting somebody else in trouble.
 

Police believe roughly 40 people were on the bus at the time. Several ambulance companies were on scene and some of the victims in the accident were taken to a fire station for medical evaluation. The rest were transported to various medical facilities for evaluation.

Given the number of people that were riding the bus at the time of the accident, it is extremely fortunate that there were no serious injuries that occurred and it was equally fortunate there were only a small number of people that were injured. Since the bus rolled over, the chances of more severe injuries were very high. The bus accident could also have been fatal, especially for the woman that was trapped underneath the bus for a whole hour.

Although the people in this bus accident were very lucky to have been able to walk away from the incident, there are many bus crashes where the victims are not as lucky. Numerous factors including the weight of the bus, the number of riders and the speed of the bus contribute to extremely severe accidents that result in multiple fatalities or serious injuries. In general, mass transit is a safe and viable option of transportation for many people.

However, there are a number of things that could happen to cause a serious accident. Since buses are much heavier than other smaller vehicles, it makes them more susceptible to rolling over. The overall weight of the bus increases as more passengers get on the bus, which also becomes a major factor for most accidents. In addition, the dangers of distracted driving or driver fatigue are much worse with regard to bus drivers because they usually transport many people at once.

The incident occurred when the bus collided with the passenger side of a Cadillac that had overcorrected itself after passing the bus. The Cadillac went into a ditch on the right side of the roadway. The bus also went into the ditch but hit a guardrail and rolled over. State troopers stated a preliminary investigation revealed the driver of a Cadillac contributed to the accident. However, no charges had been filed until further investigation could be conducted. The children’s ages ranged between 9 and 12 years of age.

When we allow vehicles such as school busses to transport our children to school or some other activity, we expect that there will be a high degree of safety. However, nobody can account for random actions from drivers in front of them including when a driver cuts in front of the bus as in this incident. The bus driver could not have foreseen that the driver in the Cadillac would over-correct in front of them. State troopers stated the Cadillac contributed to this accident. The driver could be held responsible and charged if the investigation into the accident reveals the drivers actions directly resulted in the accident.

Although the children in this incident only suffered minor injuries, the fact that the bus turned over could have easily caused more serious injuries for the children and the adults in the school bus. If an investigation reveals that the Cadillac driver’s actions directly resulted in this accident, they should be held accountable and justice should be handed in favor of the children and adults riding in this bus. A school bus’s safety should never be compromised for any reason, especially because of another driver on the road.
 

The lawsuit claims the accident occurred because of driver negligence on the part of the tractor trailer driver. The suit names the driver and the company where he was employed as defendants. Another victim in the accident; a 16-year-old family member, survived the accident.

It does not take much for a train of any size to derail. Although the train was much bigger than the tractor trailer in this incident, the impact of the trailer with the train was significant enough to cause serious damage. The report states the 18-year-old was helping her grandparents raise her four other siblings. The 18-year-old was a childhood cancer survivor. That detail makes this incident much more tragic. There are no details in the report whether the driver of the tractor trailer lost control of his vehicle leading to the collision or not. The man who filed the lawsuit could win if the tractor trailer driver is found to have committed some sort of error that directly resulted in the collision, and subsequently resulting in the two deaths.

It is always tragic when a person’s life is cut so short for any reason; but when their life is cut short as a result of negligence by a second party, it is much worse. If the driver of the tractor trailer is found to have directly contributed to the accident leading to the two deaths, he should be held accountable for his actions leading to this loss of life. While bringing justice could provide the man with financial compensation, no amount of money could possibly help him cope with losing his wife whom he had been married to for 31 years, and his eldest granddaughter.
 

Although this incident was labeled as an accident because of the man’s failure to obey the traffic signals and stop before the train crossed, there are many incidents when these types of accidents are found to be the fault of the train operator. In some cases, the train operator may unintentionally fail to stop the train before striking a pedestrian or other vehicle crossing the train tracks. Trains usually operate at very high rates of speed and it is often extremely difficult for the operator to stop the train before the accident occurs regardless of how much they try to stop it. In those cases, the train operator could still be held responsible for the accident. This train crash incident appears to be a tragic accident and the victim unfortunately lost his life, but it is very easy for an accident like this to occur due to negligence from the train operator.

Driver distraction is one of the leading causes of automobile accidents in the United States. There are many instances when a driver could easily be distracted and not see a person or another car on the road in front of them. Even if the vehicle is not traveling at a high rate of speed at the time of the accident, it is still possible for it to cause serious injuries in the event of an accident simply because of its weight. A bus weighs much more than a normal vehicle does so the possibility of serious injuries in an accident is dramatically increased. The most common forms of driver distraction is cell phone use or fumbling with the radio while driving. It is very easy for a driver to get distracted while on the road and cause a serious accident. In this incident, if the driver is found to have been distracted while she was operating the bus, she could be held accountable for causing the man’s death.

In any job requiring the use of heavy machinery, there is always an inherent risk for employees even if they are fully trained in using the machinery. As this incident demonstrates, machinery can easily fail and that failure could lead to serious injuries. Mechanical failure is one major cause of employee accidents leading to serious injuries. The proper function of the machinery that employees use cannot always be ensured and if the machinery is not properly maintained to make sure that it functions correctly, employees using the machinery could be placed in serious danger. The company in this incident could be held liable for the injuries that the victim suffered if the investigation from the OSHA and federal investigators reveals any safety hazards that the company failed to fix. Unfortunately, if any safety hazards are present and the company takes care of them, it will not reverse the tragic injuries this man suffered in the accident.

Doctors in the facility claimed the woman frequently acted out as a way to gain attention, spitting at guards and kicking or grabbing at them. In one occasion while placed in solitary confinement, the woman reportedly choked herself to unconsciousness. Smith also complained that she was being assaulted by one specific guard at the CSC, however that guard was found not guilty and reached a confidential settlement after taking his case to the Saskatchewan labor relations. The 19-year-old’s death was ultimately deemed an accident.

In any correctional facility, there is bound to be a prisoner that is difficult to work with and may cause problems for guards in charge. While certain measures do need to be taken to ensure those people do not hurt themselves or others while in the facility, completely dismissing a person’s actions as “a cry for attention” should never happen. Despite the correctional facility’s primary function, the people kept there should be completely guarded and not disregarded by any means. In addition, a guard does not have the right to abuse anybody in the correctional facility by any means. If this occurs, they should be held liable if they cause any serious injuries against the person involved.
 

Investigations showed the company did not have proper safety measures in place to prevent such an accident from occurring in the first place. As a result, the company had to pay $30,000 in compensation for the employee’s injury and an additional fine of $30,000 for failing to maintain proper safety measures for its employees.

Every company should have specific safety measures in place to ensure the safety of its employees to avoid accidents such as this one. In a situation such as this one, however, it may not be very easy to implement since they are working outdoors cutting down logs. The potential for an accident in those conditions is much higher than in other jobs. Still, the company should have taken steps to train its employees in using the machinery and in how to avoid accidents like this one. There are several ways this employee accident could have been avoided and the victim would not have to go through the pain and suffering that he did. Regardless of the nature of employment, every company should ensure that their training regiments are adequate enough to highlight potential dangers for employees and to protect their safety on the job.
 

The pit bull lunged at police several times as they investigated the incident and attempted to treat the woman. The 16-year-old claimed that the dog was suffering from separation anxiety due to being away from its mother. York County Animal Control took over the case and no arrests or charges were handed down in connection with the dog-bite incident.

The fact that the teenager made no attempts to remove the dog from the victim in this dog-bite incident could be construed as negligence on their part. Regardless of what the factors or causes of the attack were, the teen had a responsibility to prevent the dog from harming innocent bystanders that come in close proximity to the dog. Given that the dog’s owner is 16-years-old, the teen could not be charged as an adult for the attack. The fortunate part of this dog-bite incident is that the woman did not suffer serious injuries, which could have easily occurred. Still, the dog’s owner should be held responsible for their dog’s actions despite the age of the owner.
 

A third bus then failed to make a stop and collided with the back of the second bus. One of the busses involved in the accident was carrying two special needs children at the time. The two children in the school bus accident were uninjured but the driver and the monitor in the bus both complained of injuries. However, they refused medical attention when medical personnel arrived. The driver of the third bus was given a citation for following too closely to another vehicle.

One of the most important details of this report is that the children were uninjured in this auto accident. Incidents of people not following proper safety precautions on the road occur all the time, but when a driver is providing transportation to children in a school bus, it is imperative that they take extra precautions. If the children in this accident had been injured, the driver that was following too closely could have been held liable for the accident and would have faced much harsher penalties besides a citation. In addition, the driver could have also faced a lawsuit from the children’s parents for any injuries their children had suffered in the accident. Special needs children require much more care and safety than other children; therefore this incident could have been more serious than it actually was.
 

The elderly man was reportedly riding his bicycle to his friend’s house when the minivan struck him. The family issued a statement pleading with anybody that may have any information to come forward.

According to other reports about this accident, the elderly man suffered a serious head injury, roughly a dozen fractured ribs, a broken clavicle and a collapsed lung. One of the worst things about accidents like this one is that the victims often leave family members behind upon their death. Prior to his death, the man’s family stated that he was a physically fit person and despite his age, had many more years ahead of him if this accident had not occurred. The elderly man left behind a wife and a daughter among other family members. Now his family must live without a father and a husband and beloved member of their family. Nobody should ever have to face that sort of loss and not have any closure in the incident that caused that loss. Anybody that has information should help the man’s family bring the driver to justice for their reckless actions.
 

Police stated they saw one person running away from the scene on foot and one person lying on the ground at the scene of the accident. The passenger of the vehicle was ejected from the vehicle when it hit the curb and went airborne.

The car flew 50 feet in the air before it hit the ground and began rolling end-over-end. The passenger in the vehicle suffered several spinal fractures, a fractured pelvis, and several other injuries. The vehicle was found to be stolen and the owner of the vehicle pressed charges against Binder. There is no information on what penalties Binder could face as a result of this incident.

This is one of many incidents that demonstrates how alcohol can severely alter a person’s judgment and cause a very serious accident. The 19-year-old was clearly intoxicated when police caught him as he was reportedly slurring his words and staggering on his feet. The worst part of this incident is that the driver was 19 and yet he was still intoxicated. Drinking under age could result in more serious charges against him adding to the penalties he already faces as a result of this accident.
 

36-year-old Anthony Friel faces several charges resulting from this crash. The incident originally occurred when Friel tried to get away from police when they tried to stop him after he ran a red light. One of the victims in the incident was in critical condition following the accident. After a high-speed chase, Friel then collided with a commercial truck before hitting the bus stop.

According to the report, Friel was charged with eluding police with a motor vehicle and several vehicle offenses. Friel could face several other charges depending on how serious the victims’ injuries were following the accident. This is one of many aspects that most people do not realize when they try to evade police. People constantly try to avoid getting ticketed for speeding and attempt to get away from police without thinking that their actions could bring about much harsher punishments against them. Many witnesses stated that the victims suffered extremely serious injuries. This could work against Friel in regard to the charges that could be placed against him. However, since Friel blatantly attempted to get away from police and seriously injured at least three people, he should be brought to justice on behalf of those he injured.

Police were unsure of the man’s condition prior to being attacked by the dogs and believe he may have been unconscious prior to the attack. Authorities trying to assist Armstrong after the accident were forced to chase the dogs away prior to offering assistance.

Although this incident was ruled as an accident, it demonstrates how easily a dog attack can occur. It also demonstrates how a poor medical history could create a situation where a person suffers serious injuries as a result of a dog attack. If a victim of a dog attack has a history of a medical condition such as seizures or some other mental disorder, it could easily cause that person to be completely unaware of a potential attack that would cause extremely serious injuries. If the dogs in this incident belonged to anybody nearby, that person could be held liable for causing the man’s injuries and ultimately causing his death. One of the unfortunate things in this incident is that there is nobody to come to the man’s defense against the dogs. Many people often suffer extremely serious injuries because nobody is able to stop the attack from happening.
 

Co-workers rushed to provide first-aid care to Roscoe who was later transported to Orlando Regional Medical Center for medical care. Roscoe died the morning of the 14th as a result of his injuries. The accident occurred as the ride was closed for maintenance and the accident was not witnessed by any of the park’s visitors at the time.

Maintenance workers of any kind often find themselves in the line of danger, especially when they are in charge of fixing things like theme park rides that may malfunction at any time. The report stated this is the second death associated with the ride at Disney’s theme park. Theme parks have been known to be at the center of attention after patrons were killed as a result of one of the rides at the park.

There is always an inherent danger in any theme park ride and in most, if not all cases, there is an explicit warning prior to the patrons entering the ride. The report also states that Disney was fined $21,000 and after investigators discovered five safety violations in 2008. If this incident proves to be the fault of Disney or any of its workers, they could be held accountable for Roscoe’s death.
 

Police have not determined whether or not excessive speed was a factor in this accident. At the time of the accident, roadways were slick due to winter conditions in Michigan. There is no information in the report if any charges or citations have been or will be filed in connection with this incident.

When driving in icy or otherwise slick road conditions, it becomes more difficult to keep a vehicle under control because the wheels of the vehicle tend to slip on the ice. If a driver is operating a vehicle at high speeds when the roads are slick, that demonstrates a lack of judgment as they could easily get into an automobile accident or a car-pedestrian accident, injuring a pedestrian like in this incident. If the driver in this incident is found to have been driving at high speeds, they should be held accountable for their actions. As a result of this incident, the victim’s family has to suffer the loss of their loved one as a result of an accident that could have possibly been averted.
 

According to the report on Inside Healthzone.ca, a total of four incidents with injury have occurred; three of which were in the U.S. and one in Canada. The report also states that in one of those incidents, the child suffered a broken nose. The affected seats were sold between January of 2008 and July of 2010 and distributed through Direct Buy and several other stores.

The report on Inside Healthzone.ca states that the seats can be detached if the frame is not properly secured. However, one could take 2 differing views on these incidents in terms of who would be at fault. The fact that the seats may not be secured properly could be either the fault of the consumer themselves or a defect in the product preventing it from being locked and secured properly. This is the fine line that most product safety employees must walk. To determine whether the fault lies on the company’s safety measures or the consumer, the product would need to be analyzed to determine if there is an actual defect in the product causing these injuries. If the company is found to be at fault due to failure to maintain product safety, they should be held accountable for any injuries or fatalities to consumers.

So far the manufacturer of the slow cookers has had 60 reports of problems with the slow cookers that caused the control panel to melt, spark and three cases, the cookers caught fire. The CB Online report states that roughly 14 of these 60 incidents have resulted in minor damage to consumers’ countertops. No injuries have been linked to this defective product as of yet. The affected slow cookers can be returned to Burlington Coat Factory for a refund or for store credit.

Product safety issues can arise as a result of many different factors and these factors vary depending on the product that is affected. Despite strict regulations in the United States for product safety, some efforts for quality control and product safety within a company fail to detect potential hazards for consumers resulting in a recall of those items. In many cases, the manufacturers of the product in question could be held liable for injuries to consumers as a result of failure to maintain proper safety measures. This is especially true if the company is aware of the malfunction or defect and still fails to recall affected items and consumers are injured or killed as a result.
 

Baker got a hold of a flashlight and struck the victim in the arm. Police had originally charged Baker with misdemeanor charges of elder abuse and making criminal threats. Baker was facing up to two years in jail had he been convicted of those charges. Baker was also given a three-year probation sentence in connection with this incident.

This incident demonstrates how even the simplest arguments can escalate to very serious verbal or physical altercations leading to possible injuries for any parties involved. Any verbal argument can easily turn violent and one or more parties involved could wind up suffering extremely serious injuries as a result. In this incident, there was no report on the severity of the injuries Baker’s mother suffered, if any. However, that does not account for the emotional damage that the woman suffered as a result of this attack. In any case, the emotional injuries that a person suffers are just as bad as the physical injuries that they may suffer in any elder abuse or neglect case.
 

The business development director for the Brookshire Brothers stated this is the second fatality the company has had in twenty years. The first incident that occurred involved an 18-wheeler. The business development director also stated this was the first fatality to occur on the premises.

Almost all types of employment carry a certain degree of danger inherent in them. According to statistics from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, the Warehousing and Storage employment field has seen a total of 16 employee accidents with fatalities with 3 of those accidents involving contact with equipment or objects on the job. An employee accident can occur very easily and the injuries that can occur can vary widely. Some accidents on the job can cause non life-threatening injuries while other types of accidents can cause a fatality as in this incident. While companies may take the necessary precautions to prevent their employees from being injured on the job, there are still others that are negligent in this matter. If an employee is injured on the job as a result of a company owner’s negligence, they should get the compensation they deserve.
 

That lawsuit claims the former governor did not give them proper notice of his decision, which would have allowed them to contend against it. In the original incident that occurred in 2008, 22-year-old Luis Santos was involved in a brawl that began because Nunez and the 3 other defendants were angered at being barred from a fraternity party. During the brawl Jett fatally stabbed Santos in the heart.

The report states that the former governor decided to reduce Nunez’s sentence because Jett was the one who stabbed Santos and Nunez did not. As a result, the former governor felt it was unfair for Nunez to be sentenced the same length of time as Jett. However, since Nunez still played a part in Santos’ death, he should still receive a sentence equal to Jett’s. In any situation involving people causing serious injury or death to another person, those involved should be held accountable for their actions.
 

The two occupants of the vehicle – a 27-year-old woman and a 9-year-old child – sustained minor to moderate injuries. The occupant of the second vehicle was taken to a medical facility suffering severe injuries. The victims’ identities have not been released at this time. An investigation is underway to determine the cause of the accident.

This incident demonstrates one end of the spectrum in terms of the severity of most automobile accidents. While some accidents may not be severe enough to cause serious injuries, accidents such as this one can be extremely serious. Fortunately, the two occupants in the vehicle that tore in half only suffered minor injuries and will recover. However, things could have been much worse as pain and suffering is often part of an accident.. Accidents like this can be caused by various things including driver error or the fault of another driver on the road. In this incident since there were two cars involved, it is possible that one of the drivers made some sort of error in judgment that caused the accident. If that is the case, they should be held responsible for causing the accident.
 

The Ford Taurus was reportedly moving at a high rate of speed and even went airborne before hitting several other vehicles including a motorcycle. Three people were taken to a medical facility with injuries; one of them was reported in critical condition but was expected to survive their injuries sustained in the crash. Authorities are investigating the incident at this time.

This incident is yet another out of many that demonstrates the dangers of operating a vehicle at excessive speeds. When driving at high rates of speed, it is extremely difficult to react to any obstructions that may suddenly appear. Some accidents may not result in any injuries for those involved and only their vehicles may be damaged. However, as this incident demonstrates, speeding can cause very serious accidents resulting in one or more fatalities. If other causes are discovered in the investigation into this incident, the driver that is found at fault for this accident could face serious penalties.
 

The driver of the second vehicle refused to be treated and the driver of the first vehicle was listed in serious condition as of the following Friday. There is no word on the factors that contributed to the accident and all vehicle occupants were wearing seatbelts and the vehicles’ airbags deployed as normal.

The report states that the roadways were slippery because of snowfall that had occurred in the area. Inclement weather can result in severe injury because it may cause roads to become slippery or icy. Icy or slick roads can easily cause a driver to lose control of their vehicle, as was the case in this incident. Although both drivers in this incident were not reported to be driving in an unsafe manner, there are many incidents when a driver may be driving at excessive speeds or driving erratically despite the poor road condition. This can dramatically increase the chances of being involved in a serious or even fatal auto accident. If one or more people are found to be at fault for the accident, they should be held responsible for their actions and the victims in such cases deserve some form of compensation for injuries or damages.
 

This incident demonstrates to possible causes for accidents such as this one. The first is simply unforeseen events that can lead to extremely serious or even fatal accidents. Things like poor road conditions or some other cause that is out of a driver’s control can easily lead to serious accidents. This accident is deemed a freak accident because the tires falling off of the truck could not possibly be foreseen. However, if the incident is linked to errors in manufacturing of the truck’s parts, the company responsible for manufacturing the truck’s parts could be held liable for not ensuring the safety of the truck prior to its use. Regardless of what the investigation uncovers, the victim’s family deserves some form of compensation for the loss they have suffered.

In many motorcycles, the top speed can reach in excess of 100 miles per hour. Some reach nearly 200 miles per hour. Riding a motorcycle even at the posted speed limits can still be dangerous because of the limited protection in motorcycles. Riding at higher rates of speed significantly increases these dangers and can easily cause very serious injuries or fatality for the rider or other people involved in an accident. The danger is also increased when the rider is not wearing a helmet, as in this incident. It takes a significant amount of training and practice to learn to ride a motorcycle properly in comparison to operating a normal vehicle. Unfortunately, there are many incidents where people misuse that training and consequently end up in a very serious accident.

Henry attempted to speed away and even struck an officer. Another officer that came on to the scene was even thrown on the hood of his car. Police say that the officer shot in self-defense. Many eyewitnesses have stated that the policeman overreacted and that Henry was attempting to move his vehicle out of the fire lane when the police shot him. Henry died from the gunshot, and now his family is taking the first steps towards filing a wrongful death suit against the police department. There has been public outrage over the death of the young football player. Some of the witnesses stated that he was taken out of the vehicle and put into handcuffs and was left on the ground while paramedics treated officers for minor injuries. 

With a story with such high emotions and different versions of what actually happened it can be confusing for any family to know what course of action to take. Mourning the loss of a loved one is difficult especially when the death comes from such a sudden occurrence. If you suspect foul play in a loved ones death by a police officer or any city official then contacting a professional can help your family receive the closure and compensation they need. 

The attorney representing the family has stated that the mother of the child supplies the diapers for the day care and that the other diapers in the bag were soaked in the chemical Drano as well. The baby is currently being treated in a Pittsburgh hospital and will be getting multiple skin grafts and is on numerous antibiotics. The Department of Public Welfare is currently investigating the matter. No charges have been filed yet and the Butterfly Garden Early Learning Center has cooperated with officials and taken precautions to ensure that the incident does not happen to anyone else. 

No parent ever wants to see his or her child go through such a devastating injury. Childcare providers should be taking all the safety precautions in order to ensure that such a traumatic accident does not occur. Parents trust that their childcare providers are giving their children a safe and happy environment. When their safety is compromised, then those parties responsible should be held accountable for their actions. If your child was seriously injured at a daycare then pursuing compensation for your child’s injuries is important for their well being and security. 

The collision resulted in two passengers being ejected from the vehicle that was traveling southbound. One of the passengers died instantly while the other was transported to the hospital. Police are still trying to determine who the driver was. The ambulance driver suffered bone fractures from her head to her toe and has been surrounded by family and medical staff since her arrival from the accident. Titanium rods were placed in both of her legs and she is now beginning the recovery process. Investigators are still unsure if alcohol played a part in the crash. 

No matter how many safety precautions a person takes when they drive, it is still possible that a reckless driver will hit them and change their life forever. It is not easy to drive a public service vehicle like an ambulance because the reaction time to the accident and the ability to move and avoid the accident can prove to be challenging. The women in the accident now have to face expensive medical bills and countless hours of physical therapy that can put any family in financial stress. The individuals who caused this horrific accident should be held accountable for all the damages and emotional trauma. No family should ever have to endure this alone and without proper compensation for the damages. 

According to the dog’s owner, the dog was constantly being teased by kids passing by the yard and that’s why the dog attacked in the first place. However, Shott argues that the dog’s gate is always open and that the dog has bitten three people to date and she didn’t do anything to provoke the dog to attack her. In response, the dog’s owner stated that her dog is not dangerous except when provoked. The little girl’s family will be filing charges in this matter.

The argument that a dog is only dangerous when it is provoked is true to an extent. Dogs act on instinct and if they sense a threat, they will attack very quickly. It could be possible that children were teasing and provoking the dog in the past but that does not necessarily imply that Rayann Shott was doing so. Regardless whether a dog is constantly provoked or not, the owner should not leave the gates open for a dog to easily escape, as incidents like that can happen on a constant basis. It is still the owner’s responsibility to maintain security of their dog to ensure that neither the dog nor any innocent bystanders get hurt.

Reining’s dog suffered injuries to its abdomen and required surgery to repair the damage. The Rottweiler has been placed under quarantine and is now required to have a leash and a muzzle when it is not on the owner’s property. The owner was fined $305 as a result of the attack on Reining.

Many dog attacks happen in this way; the victim is caught off guard and the dog overpowers the victim, often leaving them severely injured. Unlike this incident, however, many victims are unable to get help. Sometimes the victim is forced to defend themselves and that is when injuries could become far worse. In other cases, the dog is too powerful to defend against. Regardless of the situation, if the owner can be found, they should be held responsible for their dog’s actions and the victim should be compensated in some way for the injuries and damage that occur.
 

Sabatino argues Behne was negligent in maintaining control of her vehicle including its speed and her ability to operate the vehicle. Sabatino claims he has lost wages, has become disabled and incurred pain and suffering as a result of the accident.

Head-on traffic accidents can often lead to very serious injuries. There is no information on what specific injuries Sabatino suffered in this incident but in any head-on accident, the victim can suffer severe neck and back trauma or even fatality. By reconstructing the events of the accident, investigators would be able to determine whether or not Behne was actually at fault for the accident as Sabatino claims. Many factors go into the decision on the amount of damages a victim receives including the severity of the injuries and the severity of the accident itself. In addition, the victim’s inability to work and as a result, lose wages is also taken into consideration. This incident demonstrates the ease of which an automobile accident can occur and the fact that victims can easily suffer serious injuries, especially in a head-on collision.
 

Bright was reportedly bitten in the leg, feet, hands and head and doctor’s are unsure whether Bright will be able to walk again as a result of the injuries. The dogs involved in the attack were quarantined in an animal shelter. The dog’s owner, Virgil Mitchell III showed remorse in the incident, stating that he felt terrible for what happened to Bright and he has no desire to keep the dogs.

As this incident demonstrates, dog attacks can result in minor cuts and puncture wounds to extremely serious injuries, as in this incident. Even a very small dog can inflict serious damage to the victim of an attack. A Shih Tzu dog is a relatively small dog but it is very easy for a person to be overpowered by a dog in an attack. Dog attacks are not always avoidable, but you can protect yourself to avoid serious injuries if you are attacked. Websites such as the American Kennel Club website and the CDC website can provide information on dog attacks and how to avoid serious injury.
 

He landed on a platform and was lifted up to the roadway before he was taken to the hospital.  The bridge is located on Interstate 94 over the St. Croix River.  It was not reported whether the man was a contractor or an employee of the Minnesota or Wisconsin transportation departments.  The crews have been sandblasting the bridge since summer, according to the nearby St. Croix Service.   In the article by cnn.com it was not stated how serious the injuries were or the age of the injured man.  A dangerous profession like construction can cause a serious injury to a worker at any moment.  There are many risks and in some cases the worker was not trained properly or given proper equipment to prevent an accident from occurring. 

If the injuries are serious, the man’s life could be impacted forever.  His ability to work can be compromised, and the amount of medical care can extend over to months and years of therapy or surgeries.  While medical care is costly, if the construction company is negligent they can be held responsible for compensation to the worker who was injured on the job.  It is important to contact a professional who can ensure that the medical costs are covered and that you and your family members are taken care of through this traumatic time.    

According to the lawsuit, Harvey and Jane Cutler’s pit bull dog was not on a leash. Klatch’s attorney stated that Klatch’s health began to decline as a result of complications from the fall he suffered. The wrongful death lawsuit also names the Residents’ Association in the neighborhood where the attack took place and the management company for the subdivision as defendants due to their failure to maintain limits on dog weight and leash laws. The insurance companies representing the pit bull’s owners are also named as defendants because they did not pay for Klatch’s medical bills after the attack.

A dog attack is not always a foreseeable incident in any situation. A dog’s owners may believe their dog is well-behaved and is not the type to attack a person or other animal but it is a possibility. If the dog is not bred to attack or treated poorly, which would result in instinctual attacks, there is no way of knowing if the dog has an aggressive streak or not. Therefore, it is always very hard to predict if a dog will attack or not. In this incident, the owners could still be held at fault since their dog was not on a leash. If there are leash laws that specifically state that a dog should remain on a leash, the owners could be held accountable.
 

The ten children that were transported to medical facilities were taken as a precaution because they complained of neck and back pain following the accident. 25-year-old Christopher Harple, who was driving the Mustang, was charged with failure to stop at a stop sign and failure to show proof of insurance.

Public transportation is often thought to be a very safe way to travel and is very useful for those that try to save money as they don’t have to worry about gas prices in today’s economy. However, despite its advantages, public transportation can sometimes be very dangerous. Whether you are a passenger in a bus or driving a separate vehicle, auto accidents involving a bus can be very dangerous to the passengers in the bus and to the driver of the vehicle they crash into. This is especially true for children riding in a school bus. School buses don’t have seat belts so it is very easy for a child to fall out of their seat or worse. A school bus operator should always ensure that their passengers are safely in their seats and always try and maintain safety precautions on roadways.
 

Brubaker’s mother’s lawsuit blames poor sidewalk condition and the bus the bus system for her son’s death. The suit contends that the sidewalks are designed in such a way as to prevent people from stepping toward the park to avoid bicyclists and other pedestrians. Instead, they must step toward the roadway, directly in the path of any oncoming vehicles including the Disney bus system. The suit claims Disney failed to maintain a duty of safety to its visitors to prevent such incidents from occurring. Brubaker’s mother seeks over $15,000 in damages.

A spokesperson for Disney stated that the Florida Highway Patrol report found that the driver of the bus was not at fault for the accident. However, the lawsuit claims the park is at fault because they failed to maintain a duty to its visitors. Brubaker’s mother can prove that Disney was negligent in this matter if there is proof that the breach of duty was foreseeable. If there is no specific evidence that this incident, or any other incident, was a foreseeable danger, it will be difficult to prove the company was negligent.
 

Harvey was not wearing a safety helmet at the time of he accident. An 8-year-old witness to the accident told officer Daniel McFee that he saw the vehicle approaching and tried to warn his friend but wasn’t able to do so in time. A second witness stated that she also saw the vehicle coming at a high rate of speed in comparison to the speed limit in residential areas. There is no information given on the severity of Harvey’s injuries after the accident.

There are many instances when drivers either fail to notice speed limit signs before entering residential areas or ignoring signs altogether. Unfortunately, that is when serious accidents occur and in many cases, the victims are left seriously injured because the vehicle travels at a high rate of speed. In most residential areas, the speed limit is 25 miles per hour. However, many drivers drive in excess of that speed and are often unable to stop when a pedestrian or other vehicle crosses in front of them.

This can happen when the child is not safely harnessed into the stroller. The specific models that are affected by the recall are the Tike Tech Single City X3 and X3 Sport models of jogging strollers. Consumers are strongly urged not to use these products any longer if they find that they own the models that are effected. The report states that there have been no incidents of death or injury as a result of the defective product.

To think that your baby could be put in harms way is a scary thing. Consumer safety is always important especially with products that are marketed or sold for children and babies. Unfortunately, due to poor design quality or other defects, or poor usage, children often find themselves in dangerous situations that could easily cause very serious injury or death. It is very easy for a child to fall into these situations, as they are incapable of discerning what is dangerous and what is not. In any case, you should always ensure that the products you buy for your children are safe and monitor your children when using them.
 

His mother argues that the explosion was a direct cause of death. According to the lawsuit, the boy’s room at the university was in poor condition following the explosion as he found dust or soot all over the room. The report states his dorm room was facing the Bayer plant that exploded, which resulted in the dust being in his room because the window was open. The boy later went to the emergency room complaining of chest pains and shortness of breath. He was treated and released but later returned and subsequently died. The suit claims the Bayer plant was negligent in notifying the public of the release of hazardous chemicals.

The company argued that they saw no health risk through chemicals for the general public prior to the explosion of their plant. If that is the case and the company can prove this is true, then this lawsuit may be difficult to win. If they saw no health risk, they had no way of knowing that the boy, or anybody else, could have died as a result of the aftereffects of the explosion.

The injury is also known as an “open fracture” which means that the bone in his lower left leg was broken and pierced through his skin and protruded from his leg.  The surgeons at via Christi Hospital in Wichita attempted to insert a titanium rod into Trevor’s leg, but experienced complications from the injury.  A blow on the football field was what had originally caused the injury and nearly a week after the blow Roberts had to have his leg amputated above the knee.  Unfortunately, Trevor had contracted a severe case of gangrene with his injury, which made the leg amputation a necessity.  He has so far had to undergo three surgeries but doctors are releasing him as early as this Thursday because of how well he is recovering.  According to the article by foxnews.com, high school related injuries account for 30,000 hospitalizations each year. 

Students all over the country are participating in sports on a daily basis.  Although the possibility of injury is always there, no child ever suspects that an injury could have the consequences of losing a limb and impacting their life forever.  Although it may appear that an accident of this magnitude is not the fault of any single party, there are many other possible factors that should be brought to light.  A coach or school could be responsible for not properly training their athletes to handle a blow like he did or the player who struck him could be held responsible if he was too rough and not sportsmanlike.  

The bus’s windshield shattered upon impact with the divider and three of the people that were injured were ejected through the passenger windows. The uninjured were taken to a church where they awaited another bus to drive them the rest of the way to their original destination. There is no information on the factors that contributed to the accident.

Public transportation is often thought to be a very safe way to travel and is very useful for those that try to save money as they don’t have to worry about gas prices in today’s economy. However, despite its advantages, public transportation can sometimes be very dangerous. Whether you are a passenger in a bus or driving a separate vehicle, auto accidents involving a bus can be very dangerous to the passengers in the bus. These types of accidents can lead to very serious injuries for all parties involved. In some cases, the driver in a bus could be easily distracted by a passenger in the bus and can inadvertently crash into a vehicle ahead of them. Driver fatigue can also be a major contributor to accidents involving a bus because bus drivers often drive for long hours in a day without getting a break. Although there is no way to ensure bus drivers maintain their vehicles properly and follow safety measures on the road, you can do so yourself. Always ensure you follow road signs and take extreme caution when on the road.
 

One of the most recent lawsuits filed involves Daniel Swainston, who was crushed by the vehicle and suffered a broken leg as a result. According to Swainston, the vehicle tipped over when he was driving at a low speed through the Sequoia National Forest. The initial accident occurred in 2006 and the trial will occur in November of this year. The report states Yamaha faces roughly 700 lawsuits as a result of the accidents involving this vehicle.

According to the report, Yamaha is being accused of quickly settling cases where there is significant evidence that the company was at fault for the accidents named in the cases. However, in cases where evidence explicitly shows the driver was at fault, the company is quick to allow these cases to go to court as a way of creating a façade that the company is a responsible company and the drivers of their vehicles are not. The lawsuits that this company faces are very similar to those that Toyota faces currently with their vehicles. If the accusation that Yamaha selects cases they can easily win is true, it demonstrates the company’s lack of responsibility in ensuring or even caring for their customer’s safety. It demonstrates that they would rather be quick to blame the consumer rather than take responsibility if the accidents are caused by a malfunction or defect in their vehicles.
 

This is the largest recall that the restaurant chain has faced since 2001. Overall they have faced a total of four recalls including recalls in 2001, 2002, and 2005. Prior to this recall, the largest recall totaled 144,000 children’s toys sold by the restaurant chain. There are no injuries reported as of yet in this incident. However, two children did manage to remove the batteries from the pack. One of the children swallowed a battery while the other stuck a battery in his nose.

According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, in 2008 approximately 19 reports had been filed regarding toy-related deaths involving children younger than 15 years old. A majority of these deaths involved a choking hazard resulting from a small toy or a small piece from a toy. Although there were no reported injuries or deaths in this particular incident, the statistics show that it is very easy for a child to be seriously injured or killed when a toy is not designed properly or is defective in some way. The Chuck E. Cheese restaurant chain as stated that their parent company will ensure that any toys they give away as prizes or sell to children will be designed with better specs to avoid more hazards of this nature.
 

The report states that the medical facility argued that Sinclair did not immediately report to the triage desk to receive proper treatment but security video in the facility proved that to be untrue. Sinclair’s family is seeking $1.6 million in the lawsuit against the medical facility. The facility’s chief medical officer and 13 other medical staff members are named in the lawsuit, according to the story.

The fact that the medical facility in this incident blatantly disregarded Sinclair’s requests for care and neglected him demonstrates a blatant lack of rights for the patient. In any medical facility, a person has every right to receive the care that they require and should never be denied for any reason. In addition, the fact that the facility tried to cover up their negligence and argue that Sinclair never requested any care from the facility compounds the problem. A medical facility should be a place where people can be assured proper care and treatment for their ailments, not a place where a person could potentially be denied care for seemingly no reason at all.
 

The report states that the dog had been vaccinated and did not show any signs of rabies or other diseases that the boy could have contracted in the attack. According to the dog’s owners, the dog had not bitten anybody else before this incident.

There are many misconceptions that dog owners often believe and one of those misconceptions is that their dog is not an aggressive dog because he/she has never shown any signs of aggressiveness. That is never the case as many incidents involve a dog that has never shown a history of aggressiveness. There are many reasons why a dog would become aggressive in any situation. Some of these reasons include if the dog is high strung or if they sense a threat of some kind. A dog only acts on instinct and does not know the difference between what is right and what is wrong. As a result, a dog does not know not to bite somebody because they are the owner. A dog will always respond in an aggressive manner if they see that it is necessary for them to do so in order to protect themselves or their territory.
 

 According to reports, the accident occurred at around 9 p.m. The car apparently ran into an embankment causing it to flip. One of the passengers was ejected from the vehicle and critically injured. He was immediately transported to Roanoke Memorial Hospital for treatment. The second passanger in the vehicle was taken to Valley Medical Center with serious injuries. The driver of the vehicle was Thomas Elwood Wade of Pulaski who suffered minor injuries from the crash. He will be charged with driving under the influence. The crash is currently being investigated by the New River Valley Regional Crash Investigation Team. 

According to Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), every 45 minutes someone is killed by a drunk driver. A night out with friends led to such a tragic accident that could have been prevented. In many DUI cases, many families make the mistake in assuming that it does not need to be looked into any further than filing a police report. DUI cases are extremely complex and there are many factors that could have caused you or your family member’s injury. 

This accident illustrates the dangers the motorcycle riders face when sharing the road with other vehicles. Fatalities and critical injuries are much more likely for motorcyclists than other types of motorists. This is due to both the lack of protection motorcycles provide and the likelihood that inattentive drivers will not see them.

Automobile drivers must be aware of their surroundings and watch out for motorcyclists, as well as pedestrians and bicyclists. If they cause an accident because they did not see a motorcyclist, they should be held responsible. Leaving the scene of an accident is unacceptable in any situation, especially in motorcycle accidents where the injuries may be severe and require

. If the pickup truck driver had not fled the scene, it is possible the motorcyclist could have survived. Hopefully, the driver will be held liable for the motorcyclist's

However, rather than face murder charges, the man will face a wrongful death lawsuit from Clark’s family. According to the lawsuit, neither Clark nor his friends were carrying weapons of any kind in order to pose a threat to the man that killed him. Therefore, Clark’s family believes the claim of self-defense is untrue. The report states that there is no court date set for the wrongful death suit nor is there a dollar amount named for damages for Clark’s family.

In most cases, people will try to claim self-defense if they are found at fault for harming or killing somebody. However, in this incident, if Clark’s family is right and there is no evidence that Clark had any type of weapon, then the self-defense claim will be difficult to prove. Regardless, filing a wrongful death suit is warranted since there are no murder charges because Clark’s family deserves to have justice for the loss of their loved one.
 

Dr. Domalik’s employer, the William W. Backus Hospital, is also named in the lawsuit. The report states Gault found his wife unresponsive; apparently suffering from hypoglycemic shock after taking 6mg of Glimepiride, a drug that is supposed to lower blood sugar. A senior physician adviser stated the recommended dose of the drug should be 1mg per day.

Although this does not appear to be intentional negligence on the part of the hospital or the doctor that administered the medication, it is negligence nonetheless and the lawsuit is warranted. Even if medical professionals do not set out to intentionally harm their patients, unfortunately misuse of medication still occurs. In other cases, medical professionals intentionally give their patients more medication than they may require or do not provide medication to their patients at all. In any case, those that lose a loved one as a result of this negligence deserve to have justice and compensation for their loss.

The affected models are the 32-inch LCD televisions with a model number LC-32SB28UT. The televisions were reportedly manufactured between March 2010 and April of 2010 and sold from March to August. The website has provided information on the serial numbers associated with the recalled televisions. No injuries have been reported at this time. Consumers can contact Sharp Electronics Corporation for a replacement of the defective neck support.

In today’s consumer world, people follow the notion that bigger is better. People always want to buy the bigger television or computer monitor and have the best products available. However, even the best and biggest products are susceptible to defects, as this recall demonstrates. If a product such as a large television set has a defective support, it can easily fall over and cause harm to the consumer. While larger televisions may provide better entertainment, they also pose a bigger risk of injury if a malfunction or some other kind of accident were to occur.
 

Several people were treated on site for minor injuries and six people were taken to local hospitals, two with serious injuries. According to the report, the accident occurred after a rainstorm traveled through the Phoenix area on Saturday afternoon. There is no information regarding the specific injuries that people suffered in the massive pileup. No deaths were reported in this accident.

Poor weather conditions are among the highest reasons for automobile accidents. Inclement weather can result in severe injury because it may cause roads to become slippery or icy, which would cause a vehicle to lose control and cause an accident. It just takes one driver missing a turn or failing to stop and it can easily cause other vehicles to stop abruptly. If the roads are slippery, as in this incident, the vehicles’ tire treads will not be able to grab onto the road to prevent a major accident. In many cases, some drivers suffer extremely serious injuries and even fatalities.
 

The dogs pounced on her when she tried to get to her feet and they bit her arms and legs repeatedly, according to the report. She also suffered a broken jaw in two places and several gashes throughout her body. As a result, Rhianna Kidd was forced to undergo three hours of plastic surgery to repair the damage from the attack. The girl’s father stated she is recovering from the plastic surgery at this time. Police stated the girl’s injuries are not life-threatening injuries.

The report stated that Rhianna Kidd was just a few yards from her home riding her bike from school. That is the danger that children face as a result of stray dogs on the streets. Although not all dogs will attack, statistics of dog attacks in the U.S. are significantly high. Statistics from the CDC show that 4.7 million people are attacked every year and approximately 800,000 require medical attention of some sort. In addition, approximately 386,000 require attention from emergency staff in a hospital. Unfortunately, half of the people that require medical attention are children. There are many websites that provide general information on dog attacks and how they can be prevented.
 

The injured includes a 16-year-old girl who was on the flight for an introductory flight for possible flying lessons and a 46-year-old flight instructor who is suffering life threatening injuries. The plane was a single engine Remos airplane. The crash occurred at Marana Northwest Regional Airport where witnesses saw the plane take off, take a hard right turn, circle around and miss the runway causing the plane to land in a field nearby. Luckily a medical helicopter crew that was based in the airport began helping the girl and flight instructor right away. The Federal Aviation Administration has stated that the federal agency is investigating the crash. 

Plane crashes occur much more frequently than is imagined. There are a number of causes that could be responsible for the crash like this one. If the company who built the airplane has manufactured a defective part of equipment, then they could be held accountable for any injuries that occurred in the crash. The people that maintain the engine of the plane can also be held accountable if they improperly fixed or improperly inspected the plane. If you or a family member was injured in a plane crash related accident, then contacting an Arizona personal injury attorney is your best option for compensation

The 19^th month old, Samuel Van Donslear, suffered 45 puncture wounds, collapsed lungs, a bruised kidney, bleeding spleen, trauma to his pancreas, and severe tears to his stomach and groin area. The doctors of the boy have given him a 70 percent chance of full recovery and the mother Cheryl Van Donslear is optimistic. According to reports, Samuel had somehow got out of the house and wandered over the neighbor’s yard, where witnesses say the dog was tied to a tree and started biting the child’s lower extremities.   The Sioux City Animal Adoption and Rescue Center has impounded the dog, and the police department is continuing an ongoing investigation due to the severity of the child’s injuries. The dog is believed to be a wolf hybrid by Cheryl Van Donslear, but it is still unclear the breed of the dog. The dog bite is the second to occur in the neighborhood this week. 

When a child suffers a dog bite, their injuries are often more serious due to their inability to fight off a dog. It is important for dog owners to be aware of the behavior of their dog in order to establish whether or not it is dangerous to others. There is also the issue of making sure your backyard is completely enclosed, especially if your dog exhibits aggressive tendencies. No child should ever have to suffer a brutal attack by a dog. If you or a family member was recently attacked by a dog, contacting an Arizona personal injury attorney is your best option for compensation.

In the incident involving Roy Hearn, he was reportedly riding his motorcycle followed by his son and a third rider when he apparently lost control of the motorcycle on an S-turn roadway. Hearn collided head-on with a pickup truck that was traveling in the opposite direction. Hearn’s son lost control of his own motorcycle after the exhaust pipe got caught on the road and Michael Hearn landed in an embankment. Michael Hearn was reportedly injured in the accident but was treated at a medical facility and released. There are many potential causes for the accident including the fact that Hearn had previously ridden a motorcycle for years but prior to the accident, Hearn had not ridden in some time. Other possible factors are motorcycle wear, unfamiliarity with the roadways and possible road defects.

Motorcycle accidents can sometimes be attributed to inexperience on the part of a rider. Not only can inexperience be constituted when a rider did not previously ride a motorcycle, but also when a long span of time has past since the last time they had ridden a motorcycle. Inexperience with certain routes can also cause trouble for a motorcycle rider and inevitably lead to a serious accident, primarily because the rider may not see if a turn is coming or a sudden stop and they may miss it. This can easily lead to extremely dangerous situations for motorcycle riders.
 

Sherriff’s officers argue that the chase never exceeded speeds that would constitute high-speed. According to police, the driver of the vehicle being chased sped off in an attempt to flee from police officers after he sped by them. Officers attempted to flag the vehicle down when the driver began accelerating to get away from the police. Sherriff’s police argued they did not engage with the offending vehicle but instead called for back up. The parents of the 16-year-old victim are questioning police statements that they were not speeding, which is the reason for the wrongful-death lawsuit.

It is very easy for somebody to deny responsibility for any incident that occurs. According to the report of this incident, there is reportedly evidence that shows the police officers were not speeding at the time of the accident. If evidence does turn up showing that the officers were not speeding, it would be very difficult for the parents of the 16-year-old victim to win this wrongful death lawsuit. However, this should not stop anybody from trying to get justice and compensation should they find themselves in the same situation.
 

The dog was reportedly unrestrained and ran toward the little boy in an aggressive manner. The boy’s father, Gavin Halsey said things could have been much worse as the boy was standing between the dog and a small baby. Halsey believes the baby could have easily been the victim of the attack instead of his son, which could potentially have been much worse. Halsey was upset over the lack of sympathy the two dog owners showed over the attack as they simply drove away in their car following the incident. There is no news on whether any legal action will be pursued in the incident.

Halsey’s reaction to the situation is completely understandable. When your loved one is attacked by an animal belonging to another person, the general thought is that they will at least show some compassion and check on them to make sure they are ok and no serious injuries have occurred. The fact that the owners of this terrier showed no regard for Halsey’s son demonstrates that there is always going to be people that are extremely cruel in situations like this. The injuries that the boy sustained could have been far worse and could potentially have been life-threatening. There is no excuse for the lack of compassion demonstrated by the dog’s owners
 

However, just two days after receiving stitches, the boy suddenly died. The boy’s parents reportedly stated that he was delirious and had foam coming from his mouth. The boy’s death is one of 78 that have been reported in the past two years in Indonesia, according to the report. The World Health Organization reportedly recommended a mass vaccination after a reported 30,000 dog bite cases in the first half of this year alone. However, rather than heed these recommendations, the Indonesian government opted to kill over 200,000 dogs in order to stifle the attacks.

Rabies is a very serious disease that kills thousands of people when they are attacked by an infected animal. Rabies is not only limited to dogs; many other animals can be carrying the disease and can then transfer it to humans. In humans, rabies is extremely dangerous because it can kill a person within days of contracting it. Unfortunately, children are much more susceptible to contracting the disease than adults. In this instance, the child was never even tested for the rabies disease; he was simply given stitches and sent away. Actions like that can easily become cause for a lawsuit. If your loved ones have been attacked by a dog and show symptoms of rabies, you should quickly get them to a medical professional who can help. You can also contact an Arizona attorney who can assist you in your case if your loved ones have died as a result of a rabies infected dog attack.
 

When paramedics arrived at the house where the three teenagers were, the oldest of the three – a 17-year-old boy – was found unconscious. There is no information on the status of the other two teenagers; 13 and 14 years of age respectively. The report states that if large amounts of this drug are ingested, it can cause heart attacks, comas and seizures. The drug was reported stolen from an unknown location. Since an investigation is ongoing, police did not provide any more information regarding the incident.

When a medication is prescribed to a person, it is the responsibility of that person or their caregiver to ensure that nobody else has access to that medication for any reason. Unless they are licensed caregivers put in charge of caring for another person’s life, nobody should ever have access to dangerous drugs, especially young teenagers or children. This incident could have been much worse and the teens could easily have lost their lives because of the strength of this medication. Nobody should have access to medications that are not prescribed to them, if someone has prescription medications in an easily accessible area, it is that person’s responsibility to ensure that they are kept in a safe place out of reach of others.
 

The report states that former police detective Stephanie Lazarus was implicated in the murder of Sherri Rasmussen following a dispute involving another LAPD officer – John Ruetten. The report states that Ruetten and Lazarus had been dating for several years before Ruetten and Rasmussen got married. When an investigation into Rasmussen’s death began, authorities never considered Lazarus a suspect despite evidence that Lazarus threatened Rasmussen before the murder occurred. LAPD officers disregarded Rasmussen’s father’s claims that Lazarus should be considered a suspect in the crime and instead they treated the crime as a botched burglary. It was only after DNA evidence linked Lazarus to the crime that she was arrested and charged with capital murder. The family’s lawsuit claims the LAPD attempted to cover up the murder and as a result, did not charge Lazarus with any crime until evidence to the contrary surfaced. In their defense, the LAPD claims the oversight was due to incompetence on their part.

It is always the family’s right to get justice for any crimes committed against them or against their loved ones. In this incident, the Rasmussen family deserves to have justice and closure in the investigation of their daughter’s murder. A law enforcement agency should never attempt to cover up a crime committed by one of their officers as this case seems to indicate. If the LAPD in fact deliberately overlooked evidence pointing to the detective being responsible for this crime, it is their responsibility to act in due diligence and give justice to the family of Stephanie Rasmussen.

The patrol car that Lambert was driving flipped over and Lambert suffered severe injuries as a result. Lambert underwent several surgeries in order to repair the damage from the injuries but ultimately it was too much and Lambert succumbed to the injuries. According to the report, Lambert is survived by his wife, seven grandchildren and three children.

This incident serves to show that any driver on roadways could face grave danger if they are in an automobile accident. Whether you are a law enforcement officer or an average citizen, there is no way to account for the dangers that you could face while driving along roadways. There are many things that can cross the path of a vehicle that could cause it to swerve and/or overturn. In many automobile accidents, drivers often suffer very serious injuries and in some cases even fatality. For more information on what you can do if you suffer any sort of injuries in an automobile accident and you are not at fault, visit Solomon and Relihan’s personal injury website.

Seabolt is claiming that the company should be held negligent for failing to shut down the electricity from the live wire. Seabolt claims the company should be aware of any dangers in the trailer park and keep residents and visitors from suffering any kind of harm while on the premises. Seabolt is claiming she suffered several severe injuries including to her face, head, back and feet among other areas of her body. She is seeking compensation for her injuries but no amount has been reported as of yet.

A company should always be held liable for any injuries that occur to customers resulting from a defect or anything else that can cause harm. In this case, the company could have known that the live wire was still on the premises and could easily have disposed of it, preventing any injury to visitors and residents of the trailer park. The fact that they did not remove the live wire from the premises could potentially constitute negligence on the part of Slack Group.

Myers attempted to put on the brakes but he subsequently lost control of the bike and fell off of it. Myers was then taken to a medical facility but he died as a result of the injuries he suffered. There is no report whether alcohol or drugs had anything to do with this accident and police stated that speed was also not a factor.

This seems to be a very common occurrence with motorcycle accidents – the rider is unable to come to a stop and subsequently lose control of the bike. In many cases when this happens, the rider is not wearing a helmet which increases the chances of severe injury in the event of an accident. Driving at high speeds in a motorcycle, especially when not wearing a helmet is extremely dangerous in any situation. That is also one of the causes for losing control of a motorcycle as it is much easier for that to happen in a motorcycle than a car. In addition, other vehicles on the road not noticing motorcycle riders are a common problem on roadways causing accidents.

The woman’s attorney submitted evidence that Ford Motor Company failed to maintain the safety of the vehicle when they did not pay for improvements on the Explorer model. Ford engineers had discovered ways to improve safety and stability on the vehicle but did not make any changes to the vehicle. Attorneys on behalf of Ford Motor Company argued that a worn-out tire was the cause of the accident and not any defects in the vehicle itself. Nonetheless, the jury in the lawsuit Castillo filed came to a unanimous decision in Castillo’s favor and she was paid $23.4 million in damages from Ford Motor Company. Ford Motor Company argued that they will be appealing the decision, however, the report states no attempts have been made as of yet.

Vehicle manufacturers have been given much negative press for causing accidents as a result of defects or malfunctions in the design of the vehicle. This incident is one of many lawsuits that car makers have faced due to injuries to consumers resulting from flaws ranging from tire damage to overall frame damage.

The additional recall was announced as a precautionary measure after the company discovered after they determined that some of the materials used to package the products had been stored on the same wooden pallets where the chemical was found. The recalled products were reportedly sold in the U.S, Trinidad and Tobago, as well as Puerto Rico and Bermuda. This is not the first time that the company has faced a recall. They reportedly announced four recalls in the past for insufficient quality control in the products. As a result of these recalls, the company has faced a lot of scrutiny from the FDA.

When a product recall involves something like medication or food for consumers, it is extremely important to ensure the safety of consumers and immediately announce a recall of any affected products. Johnson and Johnson’s actions in recalling the affected medications and their follow-up actions demonstrate that they are working to maintain the safety of consumers.

The report contains information including which model numbers are affected by the recall. Sony has received roughly 30 reports of parts of the laptops melting due to excessive heat but no injuries have been reported as of yet. The report also provides information on how to obtain the update that can fix this issue with the Vaio laptops. According to the report, this is the third recall that Sony has faced regarding their Sony Vaio laptops. The previous two incidents occurred in 2006 as well as in 2008.

Product liability is an important issue when it comes to consumer products. In this case, Sony’s swift answer providing an update that could solve the issue demonstrates proper care for consumers to ensure the safety of their products.

The 12-year-old boy died at the scene of the accident. Pack was not injured in the accident and neither was the passenger in the vehicle she was driving.

 This incident raises many questions including why the 12-year-old boy was riding a motorcycle alone. Kentucky state law states that all riders 16-years-old and under can only operate a 90cc or less powerful motorcycle. Under the age of 12 requires direct supervision by parents or guardian and riders can only ride 70cc or less powerful motorcycle. In addition, the bikes that are legal for children 12 and up are only supposed to be off-road vehicles. As this case demonstrates, motorcycle accidents can always occur that are extremely serious. Some cases may result in less serious injuries but in most cases, the rider of the motorcycle (whether it is an off-road bike or not) could easily end up with very serious injuries or fatality.

For more information on motorcycle accidents, visit Solomon & Relihan's Motorcycle Accident website.

Baltimore police stated the man in the dirt bike was holding a toddler in the motorcycle and the toddler fell from the bike. The man then picked up the toddler and left him in a nearby alleyway following the accident. The family of the dirt bike rider refused to cooperate with authorities that are investigated the accident. The toddler was not injured in the fall he sustained. The report states that investigators continue to search for the person on the dirt bike.

Dirt bikes are illegal to operate in the city in Baltimore, according to the report, and if dirt bike riders are caught they can face criminal charges as well as have their bikes confiscated. This incident clearly demonstrates blatant negligence on the part of the rider of the dirt bike, which is something that should never occur. The fact that this rider fled the scene of the accident could potentially result in more severe criminal penalties aside from the criminal charges of operating a dirt bike on city streets.

For more information on motorcycle accidents, visit Solomon & Relihan's Motorcycle Accident website.

The lawsuit states that the company did not provide adequate warnings to consumers regarding the zinc that is contained in the Fixodent product. It was discovered in 2008 that four other incidents could have occurred involving zinc poisoning resulting from the Fixodent product.

It is a requirement of all companies to include warnings and other information regarding any potential dangers from using their products. Failure to provide adequate warnings of use could create situations such as this one where the company can be held liable for any injuries that consumers incur as a result of using a product. This is especially necessary when the product could potentially affect the victim’s health in any way. This is one specific incident where the consumers should have been warned (and have since been warned) that the product could potentially be a detriment to their health.

For more information on recalls and product liability issues, visit Solomon & Relihan's Product Liability information page.

Current laws in Kentucky require a dog to be quarantined for 10 days after any dog bit incident. However, the report states that according to the law that this quarantine can happen at any location the owner chooses, including the owner’s home.

In this incident, the Animal Control services in New Albany, KY (where the incident took place) and the Health Department allowed the owner to keep the dog in their home under quarantine. This incident was the second of two cases involving the same dog, according to the report. In the previous incident, the dog involved was taken away by the Kentucky Animal Services, however, according to the report; this decision was voluntary on the part of the dog’s owner. In the event that the court deems an animal to be dangerous, other restrictions in addition to the quarantine occur including higher fees for the owner, restraints for the animal and specific licenses to be attained by the owner.

This case demonstrates that although there could be laws put in place regarding a specific incident or situation, those laws may not always be enough to prevent dangerous or even fatal incidents from occurring. Sometimes laws may be deemed too lenient by the public, which was the case in this incident.

For more information on dog bites, visit Solomon & Relihan's Dog Bite website.

One of the occupants  was pronounced dead at the scene of the accident. The other occupant was unconscious when police got to him. He was taken to a local Delaware hospital suffering bleeding on the brain as a result of the crash. According to the report, police had not determined who was driving the car at the time and there is no information in the report regarding the cause of the accident.

This incident demonstrates some of the most severe injuries and results that could potentially occur in any automobile accident. Driving without a seatbelt presents a very dangerous hazard for drivers as this incident demonstrates. Even for the most responsible drivers on the road, driving without a seatbelt presents a very dangerous situation because there is no way to predict what can happen on roadways. There is no way to account for all the situations that an automobile accident can occur. It is always possible for a driver to lose control of their vehicle due to many different factors. If that driver is not wearing a seatbelt, the injuries that the driver sustains could be far worse than if they would be if they wear their seatbelt. Although serious injuries can occur even with a seatbelt, wearing the seatbelt could potentially prevent a driver from being ejected from the car and causing far worse injuries or fatality.

For more information on rollover accidents, visit Solomon & Relihan's Rollovers Information page.

 Operating a vehicle at excessive speeds is one of the highest known causes for auto accidents in the United States. Driving at excessive speeds impedes the driver’s ability to make sudden stops when necessary and also reduces the driver’s reaction time in any other situation. The severity of an auto accident could be greatly reduced if the drivers involved are not driving at very high speeds. In most cases, the impact of an auto accident could be reduced, thus reducing the chances of severe injuries from the accident. Speed limit signs and all other signage on roads are posted specifically to prevent automobile accidents of any kind. Still, many people inadvertently or purposely disregard these signs and continue demonstrate aggressive driving behavior which puts themselves and any others on the road in danger. In many cases, alcohol is also a major factor in automobile accidents including those that resulted from high speed driving. Alcohol impedes one’s judgment and makes it more difficult for drivers to control their driving, especially in regards to speeding.

For more information on wrongful death in car accidents, visit Solomon & Relihan's Wrongful Death Information page.

The report states that in 11 of those cases, the batteries had caused minor bodily harm to users and 31 of those cases caused minor property damage. The faulty batteries had been sold by HP and other electronic retailers between August 2007 and July 2008. The report states consumers will get a replacement battery free of charge.

According to the report, battery recalls are a common occurrence, especially for HP as they had issued recalls between 2005 and 2008. This news report demonstrates that product recalls are not only affecting automakers at a drastic rate but other industries as well. Faulty products are a common occurrence for all industries and the subsequent costs that the companies incur as a result of the recalls could be well over hundreds of millions of dollars over time. However, it is important for companies to make these recalls in order to prevent danger to customers. Although in this case the injuries have been minimal, it does not imply that all incidents will be minor ones. It is always possible for a serious injury to occur regardless of what the faulty product is and the nature of the defects or malfunctions.

For more information on recalls and other product liability issues, visit Solomon & Relihan's Product Liability information page.

Many auto accidents, whether involving a motorcycle or any other motor vehicle, sometimes occur as a result of unknown causes. In some cases, even after an investigation, some auto accidents cannot be linked to one specific cause. This can also be compounded when there are no witnesses to the accident, as was the case in this incident. If the causes were a result of another driver on the road, the lack of witnesses makes it more difficult for the victim of the accident or their families to get the answers and the closure that they deserve to have. Statistics of cases such as this one are sometimes hard to come by, and although these types of accidents are rare since an investigation reveals all the necessary information, they still do occur at times.

 For more information on motorcycle accidents, visit Solomon & Relihan's Motorcycle Accident website.

 Toyota has been at the forefront of the media as a result of several incidents that required them to recall now over 8 million of their vehicles in the past year. According to this report, the president of Toyota stated that their concern has shifted to their consumers and that is the reason for the recalls that they have made thus far this year. Some might think this is a case of too-little-too-late because of all the problems that have plagued the automaker including huge fines and several lawsuits and complaints against them. However, despite all the recalls and negative media attention that Toyota has been receiving over the last few months, they are still working to rectify the problems with their vehicles in order to ensure the safety of their consumers. That is one of the most important measures any product manufacturer can take in order to maintain good faith with the consumer and prevent any unnecessary danger or harm to customers.

For more information on the role of auto defects in accidents, visit Solomon & Relihan's Auto Defects page.

 In cases where the customer is affected by the violations committed by the auto insurer, those cases can be constituted as bad faith and can be grounds for a lawsuit. If a company does not pay a claim and completely disregards a customer’s policy, this can be considered bad faith. In addition, overcharging a customer for coverage can also be considered bad faith and customers can file a lawsuit. Bad faith occurs when the policy does not dictate that a claim can be denied for whatever reason the insurer gave the customer.

It can also occur when a company acts recklessly and disregards the customer’s rights in either accepting or denying a claim. Although bad faith claims may sometimes be problematic, if a customer can present evidence that the insurer either acted recklessly or provided a reason for denying a claim that was not part of the policy the company drew up, it can be grounds for a bad faith claim against the insurer.

For more information on insurance bad faith issues, visit Solomon & Relihan's Insurance Information page.

 Prior to the accident, a police officer was pursuing Byank to stop him for speeding. Byank attempted to get away from the officer when the accident occurred. The passenger of the motorcycle, 19-year-old Lauren Parris was pronounced dead at the medical facility that she was transported to following the accident. Byank was taken to a medical facility for injuries and was later released. New York police charged Byank with a felony charge of unlawfully fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle and multiple traffic violations. Byank appeared in front of a judge on Tuesday afternoon and Byank’s bail was set at $25,000 or $50,000 bond. The felony charge could potentially be upgraded to vehicular manslaughter, according to the report.

The incident described in this report is one of many unfortunate incidents that occur very often. In most cases regarding an automobile accident involving a motorcycle, the motorcycle rider is found to be driving at excessive speeds, putting themselves and their passengers in extreme danger. In cases that result in the death of the passenger of a motorcycle, the parties responsible for the accident should be held on criminal charges for wrongful death.

 For more information on motorcycle accidents, visit Solomon & Relihan's Motorcycle Accidents website.

According to a Fire Department spokesperson, the driver of the vehicle noticed smoke coming from the trunk, and then handed the passenger a glass of water in order to put it out. When that did not work to put out the fire, the driver decided to stop the vehicle and run to a nearby pharmacy in order to purchase more water to put out the fire, leaving his two passengers sitting in the car. Although the fire was spreading, the passengers sitting in the car had trouble getting out of the vehicle since the car was parked next to a curb and they became trapped. Fire officials arrived at the scene to find the vehicle completely engulfed in flames. Luckily the two passengers were in stable condition when taken to the hospital. The male (26 years old) and female (25) suffered from second degree burns to their hands back and neck. 

The driver is being suspected of being under the influence of alcohol and it has been reported that he did not realize the seriousness of the fire since he did not call 911. Officials suspect that the fire originated the fire started in an after-market power inverter. 

In a case like this, it is important to really evaluate what caused the fire and who is at fault. Sadly in this case, the injuries could have been preventable. Serious burns can affect the rest of your life. Many factors were involved in this accident, for instance the fire could have resulted in a manufacturer defect. To prevent this type of accident, it is important that no amount of alcohol be consumed by the driver. It is also important that at the first sign of danger you to exit the vehicle immediately. 

For more information on the dangers if driving under the influence, visit the Solomon & Relihan DUI Information page.

The rail can easily slide down or completely fall off of the crib, which presents a dangerous hazard for the child in the crib. The report also states these cribs could present a suffocation or strangulation hazard. According to the report, the Consumer Products Safety Commission has issued recalls on more than 7 million of these cribs due to safety hazards for the child.

Drop side cribs have been used for many years and according to the report, have been known to cause many accidents that have led to fatalities in almost every case. Although drop side cribs have a convenient design for parents or caretakers and allow easy access into the crib, the danger that these types of cribs present for a child far outweighs the advantages for them. The number of fatalities compounds the problem of the danger these cribs present and make enacting legislation to ban them seem like a very viable and necessary measure. Although voluntary bans from major vendors may prevent the danger to an extent, enacting legislation ensures that the child’s safety is taken into consideration and ideally should completely remove the danger that children face with these cribs.

For more information on recalls and product liability issues, visit Solomon & Relihan's Product Liability information page.

According to the report, the boy received the stitches yesterday afternoon and was released from a children’s hospital in Cleveland Ohio earlier this morning. At the time of the report, it was unknown what caused the dog to attack the boy. 
 

When a dog bites, they can cause many injuries. However, dog bite-related injuries are not just simple abrasions: about 65% of dog bites are lacerations and puncture wounds. Often, facial lacerations and puncture wounds can lead to larger consequences. Since dogs tend to lock down with their jaw and pull or tear the skin, they tend to pierce through the skin and create deep puncture wounds that are not typically on the surface. However, puncture wounds do not usually cause bleeding; they can be very painful and dangerous. Puncture wounds are prone to bacterial infection and can carry the risk of rabies-related diseases. 
 

Unfortunately, children are at an increased risk of attacks from dogs of any size because, in many cases, they are either unaware that they are provoking a dog or they do not know how to take care of them. This case demonstrates one of many instances when a child was attacked seemingly for no reason, which happens very often. Children may also be at risk for more serious injuries because they are unable to defend themselves against a dog attack like most adults might be able to.

For more information on dog bites and what to do if you or your child is bitten by a dog, visit the Solomon & Relihan Dog Bite website.

According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, a choking hazard can occur if a child puts the toy darts in their mouths. The darts can be easily inhaled and restrict breathing resulting in death. The Family Dollar stores have volunteered the recall since the company that imports the toys – Henry Gordy International – refused a recall of their own. The CPSC has requested that consumers report any incidents, whether they are related to asphyxiation or not, to the CPSC website. 
 

Product recalls occur when that product may pose a serious danger for consumers. Unfortunately, in some cases, some companies seem to refuse product recalls despite known incidence reports in order to avoid loss of money. This report demonstrates that exact situation where the importing company refuses to conduct their own recall. In cases like this, companies such as the CPSC or vendors themselves often take it upon themselves to recall the products on their own as is demonstrated here. It is also extremely important to conduct recalls of products when they can potentially cause harm to a child. Children’s safety should always be the absolute highest priority of any manufacturer or vendor of products targeted to kids.

For more information on product recalls, visit the US Consumer Products Safety Commission website.

Most of the cases were about expired food and employees not washing their hands.  All four of the locations were cited for not having food stored in the correct temperatures.  Forty-four percent of the inspections were all major violations within these establishments.  In some states it is required of the food vendor to post the most recent inspection on display, it is not a requirement in Arizona.  Vendors who have repeat violations must suffer the consequences of legal action. 

While each of the vendors spoken to in the investigation by ABC 15 claims they are committed to the customer’s safety, the paperwork claims otherwise.  Food poisoning can result in serious vomiting, nausea, stomach pains, and even death.  No one should have to face the consequences of any vendor’s negligence.  It is important to always be aware of where you and your family eat.  Before attending any event, check out the Maricopa County website where health inspections are posted.

For more information, visit the Maricopa County inspection website.

For additional information on food safety and other product liability issues, visit the Solomon & Relihan Product Liability information page.

The investigation on the Corvette resulted from 30 complaints from consumers of leaking fuel tanks. The report states that no injuries or accidents in the Corvette have been reported at this time; however, two minor incidents have been reported with the Ford Windstar. A recall of both vehicles could potentially occur if the NHSTA deems it necessary.

 It is no secret that the automotive industry has been plagued by recalls of all kinds. The most recent, and most significant, is the Toyota recall of several thousand cars of differing models for various reasons. As a result of Toyota’s delay in their recall, they were forced to pay fines of around $16.4 million. Since that time, automakers have been voluntarily recalling vehicles for various flaws and malfunctions in a timely manner seemingly in order to avoid a similar fate.

 It is very important that automakers follow all government enforced rules regarding recalls in order to prevent injury to consumers. Although incidents of accidents or injuries are minimal in the case of the Windstar, there could potentially be more serious incidents if no action is taken to remedy the situation in their vehicles. Although many accidents on roadways occur due to driver error, there are still cases when an auto accident can be caused by a malfunction in the vehicles involved.

If you are involved in an accident, a manufacturer malfunction may be one of the causes, but the malfunction may not be readily apparent.  For more information on manufacturer malfunctions and how to identify them, visit the Solomon & Relihan Auto Defects page.

Although the drain was left open, the automatic drain stopper apparently activated and the tub filled with water.  After the mother found the baby under water, the mother grabbed the child, ran outside crying and yelled, “My baby drowned” until two workers came to her and one of them performed CPR on the baby. When the firefighters showed up at the apartment complex, the baby was still not breathing.  The baby was then transported to Phoenix Children’s hospital where he was pronounced dead.  Police officials have not stated whether or not the mother will face criminal charges. 

Accidents like this one happen more often than they should.  It takes a minute of carelessness to have your life changed forever.  The family of this child cannot undo this accident, but hopefully parents will learn from this incident so the same tragic occurrence won’t happen to their family.  This tragedy should be a wakeup call for parents who think that this type of accident could never happen to them.  A child’s life should not be left to a piece of equipment.  There are several ways that an accident like this could have been prevented.  It is important that parents never leave their baby unattended so they are not left to face this emotional heartbreak.  

For more information on child drowning accidents, visit the Solomon & Relihan Child Drowning information page.

Rear impact collisions are very similar to frontal impact collisions in that it does not take a high rate of speed to cause varying degrees of injuries to victims. In most cases, rear impact collisions are not as serious as frontal or side impact collisions since both vehicles involved are traveling in the same direction and not in opposite directions – if the two vehicles were traveling in opposite directions, the impact would be far greater than if they were traveling in the same direction. Regardless, it is still possible to suffer serious injuries resulting from rear impact collisions. A majority of injuries occur as a result of the force pushing the victim forward, causing varying degrees of injury to the head, neck or back. As this case demonstrates, even fatality can occur from rear-impact collisions, especially if the driver of the other vehicle is moving at a high rate of speed.

 For more information on auto accidents and what to do if you are involved in one, please visit the Solomon & Relihan Car Accidents Information page.