Wisconsin to Make Auto Insurance Mandatory

 The news website wiscnews.com has posted a report stating that beginning June 1st, drivers will be required to have auto insurance paperwork up to date because a law will be passed requiring all Wisconsin motorists to have auto insurance. 

 The report states that police will be giving out fines ranging from $10 all the way to $500 for drivers that are pulled over without auto insurance. The report states Wisconsin was one of two states that did not require drivers to have auto insurance, however, after this new law has passed, New Hampshire will be the only state to not require auto insurance.

According to the state of Arizona insurance department, automobile insurance is required as one of several ways to prove financial responsibility. Before a person can register a vehicle in the state of Arizona, this proof is required. The required coverage for auto insurance is $15,000 per person for bodily injury and a minimum of $10,000 per accident for property damage. There are other ways for drivers to prove financial responsibility including bonds, certificates of deposit or cash amounts of up to $40,000. In the 48 states that require auto insurance, driving without auto insurance is illegal and can result in criminal penalties and revocation of your driver’s license. Without car insurance of some sort, a driver could be held liable for any automobile accidents they are involved in and it will also prevent medical coverage for any injuries they may sustain in the accident as well.

For more information on auto insurance, visit Solomon & Relihan's Insurance Issues Information page.

 

Insurance Regulators Give Out Fines in New York

 Insurancejournal.com reports that several auto insurance companies have been given fines for various violations. One insurance company was charged $360,000 for mischarging customers for auto insurance. An Illinois-based company was fined $136,000 for conducting business without a license. The report states it is the first time New York insurance regulators fined the Illinois-based company. Other fines were given to several companies and many others lost their licenses due to various violations. The report states the fines that were handed out were the highest that have been handed out.

 In cases where the customer is affected by the violations committed by the auto insurer, those cases can be constituted as bad faith and can be grounds for a lawsuit. If a company does not pay a claim and completely disregards a customer’s policy, this can be considered bad faith. In addition, overcharging a customer for coverage can also be considered bad faith and customers can file a lawsuit. Bad faith occurs when the policy does not dictate that a claim can be denied for whatever reason the insurer gave the customer.

It can also occur when a company acts recklessly and disregards the customer’s rights in either accepting or denying a claim. Although bad faith claims may sometimes be problematic, if a customer can present evidence that the insurer either acted recklessly or provided a reason for denying a claim that was not part of the policy the company drew up, it can be grounds for a bad faith claim against the insurer.

For more information on insurance bad faith issues, visit Solomon & Relihan's Insurance Information page.

Complaints Spur Investigations of Windstar and Corvette

 

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has begun two separate investigations on the Ford Windstar and Chevrolet Corvette following complaints of malfunctions. USNews.com reports that the NHSTA has received 234 complaints on malfunctions of the rear axles of 1999-2003 Ford Windstar models.

 

The investigation on the Corvette resulted from 30 complaints from consumers of leaking fuel tanks. The report states that no injuries or accidents in the Corvette have been reported at this time; however, two minor incidents have been reported with the Ford Windstar. A recall of both vehicles could potentially occur if the NHSTA deems it necessary.

 It is no secret that the automotive industry has been plagued by recalls of all kinds. The most recent, and most significant, is the Toyota recall of several thousand cars of differing models for various reasons. As a result of Toyota’s delay in their recall, they were forced to pay fines of around $16.4 million. Since that time, automakers have been voluntarily recalling vehicles for various flaws and malfunctions in a timely manner seemingly in order to avoid a similar fate.

 It is very important that automakers follow all government enforced rules regarding recalls in order to prevent injury to consumers. Although incidents of accidents or injuries are minimal in the case of the Windstar, there could potentially be more serious incidents if no action is taken to remedy the situation in their vehicles. Although many accidents on roadways occur due to driver error, there are still cases when an auto accident can be caused by a malfunction in the vehicles involved.

If you are involved in an accident, a manufacturer malfunction may be one of the causes, but the malfunction may not be readily apparent.  For more information on manufacturer malfunctions and how to identify them, visit the Solomon & Relihan Auto Defects page.

Accident Injury Settlements in Arizona

Soon after you recover from the shock of an accident, the first thing you should think about is, “how do I go about settling with the insurance company without being taken advantage of.”

You should consider settlement as two separate transactions. One for your property damage and the second for your injury.

Settling property damage claims is relatively straight forward. Your vehicle needs to be repaired or replaced and the cost of each can be determined by simply contacting repair shops and car lots to obtain estimates for repair or replacement costs for vehicles that are totaled.

Some property damage issues are in fact more complicated, such as the value of custom vehicles or the diminished value of damaged vehicle upon sale. These issues require special knowledge and negotiation.

The area requiring the attention of an attorney with investigation and negotiation expertise is that of a bodily injury claims attorney.

The value of these claims are mainly subjective necessitating knowledge of the insurance company tactics as well as local values of similar injuries.

For example, the value of an injury claim in Arizona is different than the value of an injury claim in California. The value of these claims are based, in part, on the amount juries award for similar injuries in local courts.

The likelihood of receiving the maximum value for an injury claim is substantially enhanced by a speedy investigation and an experienced negotiator.